Already a subscriber? 

MADCAD.com Free Trial
Sign up for a 3 day free trial to explore the MADCAD.com interface, PLUS access the
2009 International Building Code to see how it all works.
If you like to setup a quick demo, let us know at support@madcad.com
or +1 800.798.9296 and we will be happy to schedule a webinar for you.
Security check
Please login to your personal account to use this feature.
Please login to your authorized staff account to use this feature.
Are you sure you want to empty the cart?

BS EN IEC 62127-2:2025 Ultrasonics. Hydrophones - Calibration for ultrasonic fields, 2025
- undefined
- Annex ZA (normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications [Go to Page]
- English [Go to Page]
- CONTENTS
- FOREWORD
- INTRODUCTION
- 1 Scope
- 2 Normative references
- 3 Terms and definitions
- 4 List of symbols
- 5 Overview of calibration procedures [Go to Page]
- 5.1 Principles
- 5.2 Summary of calibration procedures
- 5.3 Reporting of results
- Tables [Go to Page]
- Table 1 – List of typical uncertainty values (for 95 % coverage) obtained by the calibration methods specified in this document and for the frequency range listed
- 5.4 Recommended calibration periods
- 6 Generic requirements of a hydrophone calibration system [Go to Page]
- 6.1 Mechanical positioning [Go to Page]
- 6.1.1 General
- 6.1.2 Accuracy of the axial hydrophone position
- 6.1.3 Accuracy of the lateral hydrophone position
- 6.2 Temperature measurements and temperature stability
- 6.3 Hydrophone size
- 6.4 Measurement vessel and water properties
- 6.5 Measurement of output voltage
- 7 Electrical considerations [Go to Page]
- 7.1 Signal type
- 7.2 Earthing
- 7.3 Measurement of hydrophone output voltage [Go to Page]
- 7.3.1 General
- 7.3.2 Electrical loading by measuring instrument
- 7.3.3 Electrical loading by extension cables
- 7.3.4 Noise
- 7.3.5 Cross-talk (radio-frequency rf pick-up) and acoustic interference
- 7.3.6 Integral hydrophone pre-amplifiers
- 8 Preparation of hydrophones [Go to Page]
- 8.1 General
- 8.2 Wetting
- 8.3 Hydrophone support
- 8.4 Influence of cable
- 9 Free field reciprocity calibration [Go to Page]
- 9.1 General
- 9.2 Object
- 9.3 General principles [Go to Page]
- 9.3.1 General
- 9.3.2 Three-transducer reciprocity calibration method
- 9.3.3 Self-reciprocity calibration method
- 9.3.4 Two-transducer reciprocity calibration method
- 9.4 Two-transducer reciprocity calibration method [Go to Page]
- 9.4.1 General
- 9.4.2 Auxiliary transducers
- 9.4.3 Reflector
- 9.4.4 Measurement field
- 9.4.5 Reciprocity approach
- 9.4.6 Measurement procedure
- 10 Free field calibration by planar scanning [Go to Page]
- 10.1 General
- 10.2 Object
- 10.3 General principle
- 10.4 Procedural requirements [Go to Page]
- 10.4.1 Hydrophone scanning
- 10.4.2 Power measurement
- 10.4.3 Transducer mounting
- 10.4.4 Measurement conditions
- 10.4.5 Measurements
- 10.5 Corrections and sources of uncertainty
- 11 Free field calibration by optical interferometry [Go to Page]
- 11.1 General
- 11.2 Principle
- 12 Calibration by comparison using a standard hydrophone [Go to Page]
- 12.1 General
- 12.2 Object
- 12.3 Principle
- 12.4 Procedural requirements [Go to Page]
- 12.4.1 Source transducer
- 12.4.2 Source transducer drive signal
- 12.4.3 Measurement system
- 12.5 Procedure [Go to Page]
- 12.5.1 Measurements (Type I): determination of the directional response of a hydrophone
- 12.5.2 Measurements (Type II): calibration by comparison using a standard hydrophone
- 12.6 Maximum hydrophone size
- Annexes [Go to Page]
- Annex A (informative) Assessment of uncertainty in free field calibration of hydrophones [Go to Page]
- A.1 General
- A.2 Overall (expanded) uncertainty
- A.3 Common sources of uncertainty
- Annex B (informative) Behaviour of PVDF polymer sensors in high-intensity ultrasonic fields [Go to Page]
- B.1 General
- B.2 Theoretical background
- B.3 Tests
- B.4 Results
- B.5 Conclusions
- Annex C (informative) Electrical loading corrections [Go to Page]
- C.1 General
- C.2 Corrections using complex impedance
- C.3 Corrections using only capacitances
- Annex D (informative) Absolute calibration of hydrophones using the planar scanning technique [Go to Page]
- D.1 Overview
- D.2 Hydrophone scanning methodology
- D.3 Corrections and sources of measurement uncertainty [Go to Page]
- D.3.1 Total power
- D.3.2 Received hydrophone signal
- D.3.3 Integration
- D.3.4 Directional response
- D.3.5 Finite size of the hydrophone
- D.3.6 Noise
- D.3.7 Nonlinear propagation
- D.3.8 Planar scanning
- D.3.9 Intensity proportional to pressure squared
- D.4 Rationale behind the planar scanning technique for calibrating hydrophones [Go to Page]
- D.4.1 General
- D.4.2 Relationship between hydrophone and transducer effective radii
- D.4.3 Justification for
- D.4.4 Derivation of Formula (D.2)
- D.4.5 Effect of nonlinear propagation, D.3.7
- Annex E (informative) Properties of water [Go to Page]
- E.1 General
- Table E.1 – Speed of sound c [54],[55] and specific acoustic impedance, ρc, as a function of temperature, for propagation in water
- Annex F (informative) The absolute calibration of hydrophones by optical interferometry [Go to Page]
- F.1 Overview
- F.2 Present position [Go to Page]
- F.2.1 "Magnomic" or nonlinear propagation-based method
- F.2.2 Optical interferometry
- F.2.3 High-frequency implementations of optical interferometry
- Figures [Go to Page]
- Figure F.1 – Experimental set-up of the interferometric foil technique
- Figure F.2 – End-of-cable open-circuit sensitivity level of a coplanar membrane hydrophone
- Figure F.3 – Experimental set-up of the heterodyne vibrometer technique
- Figure F.4 – Measured frequency-dependent radial profiles of the acoustic pulse field
- Figure F.5 – Experimentally determined spatial averaging correction versus frequency for hydrophones of different effective element diameter, deff
- Figure F.6 – End-of-cable loaded sensitivity level and sensitivity phase of a coplanar membrane hydrophone assembly at 50 Ω termination
- Figure F.7 – Hydrophone waveform generated by a 9 µm coplanar membrane hydrophone positioned at the focus of a 5 MHz transducer (focal length 51 mm)
- Figure F.8 – Interferometer displacement waveform generated with the pellicle positioned at the focus of the 5 MHz transducer (focal position 51 mm)
- Figure F.9 – Frequency spectrum of the displacement waveform (lower curve) and the differentiated displacement waveform (upper curve)
- Figure F.10 – Sensitivity of a 0,2 mm active element diameter of a 9 µm bilaminar membrane hydrophone determined at 5 MHz intervals over the frequency range 5 MHz to 60 MHz
- Annex G (informative) Waveform concepts [Go to Page]
- G.1 Overview
- G.2 Temporal waveform, frequency concepts and hydrophone positioning for comparison calibrations of hydrophones
- Table G.1 – Temporal waveform and hydrophone position concepts described in Annex G [Go to Page]
- G.3 Temporal waveform and frequency coverage concepts [Go to Page]
- G.3.1 Using a narrow-band tone-burst (concept a)
- G.3.2 Using a broadband waveform resulting from a narrow-band tone-burst after nonlinear propagation (concept b)
- G.3.3 Using a broadband pulse (concept c)
- G.3.4 Using a continuous wave frequency sweep with time delay spectrometry (concept d)
- G.3.5 Continuous wave frequency sweep with TGFA (concept e)
- G.4 Hydrophone position concepts [Go to Page]
- G.4.1 Near-field hydrophone position (concept A)
- G.4.2 Far field hydrophone position (concept B)
- G.4.3 Far field hydrophone position with special reference to a long propagation path in order to achieve nonlinear distortion (concept C)
- G.4.4 Geometric spherical focus position with focusing source transducer (low voltage or linear excitation) (concept D)
- G.4.5 Geometric spherical focus position with focusing source transducer and high voltage excitation in order to achieve nonlinear distortion (concept E)
- G.5 Special considerations for calibrations close to the face of a transducer [Go to Page]
- G.5.1 General requirement
- G.5.2 Influence of edge waves
- G.5.3 Potential influence of head waves
- G.5.4 Treatment of head waves close to the transducer
- Figure G.1 – Coordinates of a field point P in the near field of a plane-circular source transducer of radius at [Go to Page]
- [Go to Page]
- G.5.5 Statements on the usable paraxial plane wave region in the case of a near-field hydrophone position, considering both edge wave and head wave contributions
- Annex H (informative) Time delay spectrometry – Requirements and a brief review of the technique [Go to Page]
- H.1 General
- H.2 Calibration and performance evaluation of ultrasonic hydrophones using time delay spectrometry [Go to Page]
- H.2.1 Ultrasonic field parameter measured
- H.2.2 Ultrasonic frequency range over which the technique is applicable
- H.2.3 Ultrasonic field configuration for which the technique is applicable
- H.2.4 Spatial resolution
- H.2.5 Sensitivity of the technique
- H.2.6 Range over which the sensitivity is measured
- H.2.7 Reproducibility
- H.2.8 Impulse response
- H.2.9 Procedure for performing measurements
- H.3 Measurement procedure for sensitivity intercomparison
- H.4 Measurement procedure (reciprocity calibration)
- H.5 Limitations
- Annex I (informative) Determination of the phase response of hydrophones [Go to Page]
- I.1 Overview
- I.2 Coherent time delay spectrometry [Go to Page]
- I.2.1 Principle of operation
- I.2.2 Example results
- I.2.3 Uncertainties
- Figure I.1 – Phase of end-of-cable open-circuit sensitivity for two membrane hydrophones
- Table I.1 – Example of uncertainties (where a coverage factor, k = 2, is used) for a HTDS phase calibration of a needle hydrophone with a diameter of 0,2 mm, expressed at a confidence level of 95 % [Go to Page]
- [Go to Page]
- I.2.4 Limitations
- I.3 Pulse calibration technique with optical multilayer hydrophone [Go to Page]
- I.3.1 Principle of operation
- I.3.2 Example of results
- I.3.3 Uncertainties
- I.3.4 Limitations
- Figure I.2 – Phase of end-of-cable open-circuit sensitivity for a 0,2 mm diameter needle hydrophone [Go to Page]
- I.4 Nonlinear pulse propagation modelling [Go to Page]
- I.4.1 Principle of operation
- I.4.2 Limitations
- Annex J (informative) Maximum size considerations for the active element of a hydrophone [Go to Page]
- J.1 Maximum hydrophone size in the near field case (Annex G – hydrophone position concept A)
- J.2 Maximum hydrophone size in the far field case (Annex G – hydrophone position concept B)
- J.3 Maximum hydrophone size in the far field case with special reference to a long propagation path in order to achieve nonlinear distortion (Annex G – hydrophone position concept C)
- Annex K (informative) Two-transducer reciprocity calibration method [Go to Page]
- K.1 General
- K.2 Fundamentals of reciprocity
- K.3 Electrical quantities
- K.4 Diffraction correction and loss due to nonlinear sound propagation
- K.5 Ultrasonic field
- K.6 Experimental set-up [Go to Page]
- K.6.1 General
- K.6.2 Twisting reflector
- K.6.3 Translational reflector
- K.6.4 Translational auxiliary transducer
- Figure K.1 – Experimental set-up with a twisting reflector [22]
- Figure K.2 – Experimental set-up with a translational reflector [23] [Go to Page]
- K.7 Hydrophone calibration using a calibrated spherically curved auxiliary transducer based on the self-reciprocity method
- Figure K.3 – Experimental set-up with a translational auxiliary transducer [24]
- Figure K.4 – Relationship of Gc and θm(°) for several values of kah
- Table K.1 – Values of the correction coefficient Gc(kah, θm) for the spatial average effect of the free-field acoustic pressure over the hydrophone surface if it were removed
- Bibliography [Go to Page]