Already a subscriber? 

MADCAD.com Free Trial
Sign up for a 3 day free trial to explore the MADCAD.com interface, PLUS access the
2009 International Building Code to see how it all works.
If you like to setup a quick demo, let us know at support@madcad.com
or +1 800.798.9296 and we will be happy to schedule a webinar for you.
Security check
Please login to your personal account to use this feature.
Please login to your authorized staff account to use this feature.
Are you sure you want to empty the cart?

BS EN IEC 61124:2023 Reliability testing. Compliance tests for constant failure rate and constant failure intensity, 2023
- undefined
- Annex ZA (normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications
- Blank Page [Go to Page]
- English [Go to Page]
- CONTENTS
- FOREWORD
- INTRODUCTION
- 1 Scope
- 2 Normative references
- 3 Terms, definitions, abbreviated terms and symbols [Go to Page]
- 3.1 Terms and definitions
- 3.2 Abbreviated terms and symbols [Go to Page]
- 3.2.1 Abbreviated terms
- 3.2.2 Symbols
- 4 General requirements and area of application [Go to Page]
- 4.1 Requirements and characteristics
- 4.2 Applicability to replaced and repaired items
- 4.3 Types of test plans [Go to Page]
- 4.3.1 General
- 4.3.2 Advantages and disadvantages of the different test plan types
- Tables [Go to Page]
- Table 1 – Advantages and disadvantages for the different test plan types
- 5 General test procedure [Go to Page]
- 5.1 Test conditions
- Figures [Go to Page]
- Figure 1 – Relative ETT (Te*/m0) and MaxTT (Tt*/m0) of various tests with the same risks
- 5.2 General characteristics of the test plans
- 5.3 Data to be recorded
- 5.4 Calculation of accumulated test time, T*
- 5.5 Number of failures
- 6 Truncated sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) plans [Go to Page]
- 6.1 General
- 6.2 Common test procedure
- 6.3 Decision criteria
- 6.4 Operating characteristic (OC) curve
- Figure 2 – SPRT diagram and test example
- Table 2 – OC curve
- 6.5 Expected accumulated test time to decision (ETT)
- Figure 3 – OC curve, Pa
- Table 3 – Relative ETT versus m/m0
- 6.6 Overview of test plans
- Figure 4 – SPRT – Curve of expected accumulated test time to decision (ETT)
- Table 4 – Overview of type A SPRT plans
- 7 Fixed time/failure terminated test plans – Fixed duration (to acceptance) test plans [Go to Page]
- 7.1 General
- Table 5 – Overview of type C SPRT plans
- 7.2 Common test procedure
- 7.3 Decision criteria
- 7.4 Test plans
- 8 Design of alternative time/failure terminated test plans (FTFT) [Go to Page]
- 8.1 General
- 8.2 Design procedures
- Table 6 – Type B FTFT plans
- 8.3 Common FTFT procedure
- 8.4 Decision criteria
- 9 Calendar time/failure terminated test plans (FTFT) for non-replaced items [Go to Page]
- 9.1 General
- 9.2 Common test procedure
- 9.3 Decision criteria
- 9.4 Use of IEC 61123:2019, Table 5 for fixed calendar time tests [Go to Page]
- 9.4.1 General
- 9.4.2 Procedure when the test time is given
- 9.4.3 Procedure when the number of items is given
- 10 Combined test plans [Go to Page]
- 10.1 General
- 10.2 Common test procedure
- 10.3 Decision criteria
- 10.4 Test plans
- Figure 5 – Example of a decision graph for combinedtest plan (type D) and for SPRT type C
- 11 Performing the test and presenting the results [Go to Page]
- Table 7 – Overview of type D combined plans
- Annex A (normative)Tables for border lines of SPRT plans (types A and C) [Go to Page]
- A.1 Symbols
- A.2 Border lines
- Figure A.1 – Decision graph of SPRT plan
- Table A.1 – Constants for border line formulae and their coordinatesfor type A SPRT plans
- Table A.2 – Constants for border line formulae and their coordinatesfor type C SPRT plans
- A.3 Example of the SPRT plan from Clause 6
- Table A.3 – Example for SPRT using test plan A.41 (with example data)
- Annex B (normative)Tables and graphs for combined test plans (type D) [Go to Page]
- B.1 General
- Table B.1 – Combined test plans in Annex B
- Table B.2 – Type D test plans – Accept and reject lines
- B.2 Test plans D.3 and C.3 (α = β = 10 %, D = 1,7)
- Table B.3 – Expected accumulated test time to acceptance decision,Te*(+), for D and C test plans
- Table B.4 – Accept and reject lines for D.3 and C.3 test plans
- Figure B.1 – Expected accumulated test time to acceptance decision,Te*(+) for D.3 and C.3 test plans
- Figure B.2 – Operating characteristic Pa for D.3 and C.3 test plans
- Annex C (informative)Extension of the set of SPRTs type A [Go to Page]
- C.1 Symbols
- C.2 Extension of the set of type A tests (through interpolation by α and β )
- Table C.1 – Example for interpolation by α and β
- Annex D (informative)Approximation of operating characteristic fortype A SPRTs by Wald's formula [Go to Page]
- D.1 Symbols
- D.2 Approximations of OC in this document
- D.3 Approximation of OC for type A SPRT by Wald's formula
- Figure D.1 – Approximation of OC for type A SPRT using Wald's formula
- D.4 Construction of the approximated OC curve using a spreadsheet
- Table D.1 – Spreadsheet set-up for construction of the OC curve by Wald
- Table D.2 – Formulae embedded in the spreadsheet
- Annex E (informative)Mathematical references and examples forfixed time/failure terminated test (FTFT) plans [Go to Page]
- E.1 Symbols
- E.2 Mathematical references [Go to Page]
- E.2.1 General
- E.2.2 Mathematical references
- E.2.3 Design procedure {a}
- Table E.1 – List of the typical FTFT design procedures [Go to Page]
- E.2.4 Design procedure {b}
- E.2.5 Design procedure {c}
- E.2.6 Design procedure {d}
- E.3 Examples of FTFT design using test plans B [Go to Page]
- E.3.1 Example 1
- E.3.2 Example 2
- Figure E.1 – Example 1 – Expected accumulated test timeto decision (ETT) of tests B.2 and A.25
- E.4 Test OC approximation using formula for FTFT
- Figure E.2 – Example 1 – Operating characteristic of tests B.2 and A.25
- Annex F (informative)Examples of FTFT design using a spreadsheet program [Go to Page]
- F.1 General
- Table F.1 – Set-up of the spreadsheet with embedded formulae
- F.2 Finding the test border lines using optimization on the example of the design procedure {b}
- Table F.2 – Formulae embedded in the spreadsheet
- Table F.3 – Fragment from Table 6
- F.3 ETT and OC curves
- Figure F.1 – Using Solver to find Tt*/m0 –Accumulated test truncation time in terms of m0
- Figure F.2 – ETT plotted from the spreadsheet calculations
- Figure F.3 – OC curve plotted from the spreadsheet calculations
- F.4 Example of FTFT design by procedure {a}
- Table F.4 – Set-up 1 of the spreadsheet for example by procedure {a}
- Figure F.4 – Using Solver to find Tt*/m0 and c in Step {a1}
- Table F.5 – Set-up 2 of the spreadsheet for example by procedure {a}
- F.5 Example of FTFT design by procedure {c}
- Figure F.5 – Using Solver to find Tt*/m0 in Step {a2}
- Table F.6 – Set-up 3 (final solution) for example by procedure {a}
- Table F.7 – Set-up 2 for example by procedure {c}
- F.6 Example of FTFT design by procedure {d}
- Figure F.6 – Using Solver to find Tt*/m0 in Step {c2}
- Table F.8 – Set-up 3 (final solution) for example by procedure {c}
- Table F.9 – Set-up 1 of the spreadsheet for example by procedure {d}
- Figure F.7 – Using Solver to find D and c in Step {d1}
- Table F.10 – Set-up 2 of the spreadsheet for example by procedure {d}
- F.7 Example of a test with replacement of failed items
- Figure F.8 – Using Solver to find D and Tt* in Step {d2}
- Table F.11 – Set-up 3 (final solution) for example by procedure {d}
- F.8 Evaluation of an approximate OC for non-FTFT plans using a spreadsheet
- Table F.12 – Set-up of the spreadsheet with embedded formulae from Clause F.8
- Figure F.9 – Using Solver to find c and Tt*/m0 from Clause F.8
- Table F.13 – Set-up 1 of the spreadsheet from Clause F.8
- Table F.14 – Set-up 2 of the spreadsheet for example from Clause F.8
- Figure F.10 – OC approximated by formula for FTFT (example from Clause F.8)
- Annex G (informative)Examples and mathematical references forthe calendar time terminated test plans [Go to Page]
- G.1 Examples [Go to Page]
- G.1.1 Example 1
- G.1.2 Example 2
- G.2 Mathematical background
- Annex H (informative)Derivation and mathematical reference for the optimized test plansof GOST R 27 402 [12] [Go to Page]
- H.1 Symbols
- H.2 Test plan types and terminology
- H.3 Introductory remarks
- Figure H.1 – Test plan types and terminology
- H.4 Procedure used for developing the optimized test plans
- Figure H.2 – Principle of test plans
- Figure H.3 – Partitioning of the test plan graph
- Figure H.4 – Interior nodes and border nodes
- Figure H.5 – Paths to the accept line
- Figure H.6 – Paths to the reject line
- Figure H.7 – Probabilities of paths transfer between nodes
- Figure H.8 – Recurrent element – Two cases
- Bibliography [Go to Page]